Well very very interesting news,, i have just come to know,,,,

Well Newton's 3rd law is proven to wrong by a Pakistani Student of "rawalpindi city" , "Asghar Mall College",,,, well i have come to know that it is approved by The bunch of Pakistani Scientist including the leading Professor "Hood Bhae" and this guy has written his own book as well,,,, and this philosophy is under discussion out side pakistan now,,,, do any body knows about that,, how much truth it has,,,,,,,,, some one told me that "this student defined that "Action and reaction belongs to the same one body, there is no envolvment of the second body,,, i dont know the details,,,, m exploring this,, if anybody knows something about that, do share here...

"Action and reaction belongs to the same one body, there is no envolvment of the second body,,,



Mujhey tou iss baat main koi na'ee baat nazar nahin aati ...
ye baat tou " Uncle NewTon " keh ga'ey thay k

" Har amal ka Radd e amal baa'hm barabar magar Mukhaliff simt main hota hay "

iss sey he wazeh ho jata hay k .. " amal " k liey sirf aik he body ka zikr hay ....

ya mujhey aisa lagta hay ....???

i l enquire the detail and soon i l post,,,but u forgot that uncle newton quoted an example that if you will throw a ball with full force towards the wall, thats the action, and in result the wall applies the same force on the ball and pushes it back,,, so two bodies r envolved in Action and reaction ,,,wot do u say ,,,, but m not confirmed about that, just heard that,,but m in search of its reality,,, lets c

humm
agar 2 bodies ki bajayay aik body bhi ho to basic law to thik hi rahay ga phir bhi .........2 bodies ki baat to example di jati hay na warna to Law to yeh hay "Action & reaction are equal but in opposite direction"

khair agar kisi Pakistani nay iss ko mazeed enhance kiya hay to that's very good

Well third law says that : Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
So, the the role of both bodies is there and I don't see anything wrong with that as a lot of forces are involved in it especially force of gravitation.

it seams just a hoax and nothing else. big reasons are:

1. Any new thing is published in scientific journals as article and not in book,,
2. I didn't find anything related in google, it this is the case, then it could be such a big issue that there must be pages over this issue, not only in the case of failure, but also in the case of un-proved controversy