
What is CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR?
A conscientious objector (CO) is an individual who, on religious, moral or ethical grounds, refuses to participate as a combatant in war or, in some cases, to take any role that would support a combatant organization armed forces. In the first case, conscientious objectors may be willing to accept non-combatant roles during conscription or military service. In the second case, the CO objects to any role within armed forces and results in complete rejection of conscription or military service and, in some countries, assignment to an alternative civilian service as a substitute for conscription or military service. The international definition of conscientious objection officially broadened in 1998, when the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights document called “Conscientious objection to military service, United Nations Commission on Human Rights resolution 1998/77” officially recognized that “persons [already] performing military service may develop conscientious objections.” [1] Some COs may consider themselves either pacifist or antimilitarist.
QUOTE

Conscientious objection to military service
Commission on Human Rights resolution 1998/77
The Commission on Human Rights,
Bearing in mind that it is recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person, as well as the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion and the right not to be discriminated against,
Recalling its previous resolutions on the subject, most recently resolution 1995/83 of 8 March 1995, in which it recognized the right of everyone to have conscientious objections to military service as a legitimate exercise of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, as well as article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and General Comment No. 22 of the Human Rights Committee, adopted at its fortyeighth session in 1993,
Having considered the report of the Secretary-General (E/CN.4/1997/99),
Recognizing that conscientious objection to military service derives from principles and reasons of conscience, including profound convictions, arising from religious, moral, ethical, humanitarian or similar motives,
Aware that persons performing military service may develop conscientious objections,
Recalling article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which recognizes the right of everyone to seek and enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution,
1. Draws attention to the right of everyone to have conscientious objections to military service as a legitimate exercise of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, as laid down in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;
2. Welcomes the fact that some States accept claims of conscientious objection as valid without inquiry;
3. Calls upon States that do not have such a system to establish independent and impartial decision-making bodies with the task of determining whether a conscientious objection is genuinely held in a specific case, taking account of the requirement not to discriminate between conscientious objectors on the basis of the nature of their particular beliefs;
4. Reminds States with a system of compulsory military service, where such provision has not already been made, of its recommendation that they provide for conscientious objectors various forms of alternative service which are compatible with the reasons for conscientious objection, of a noncombatant or civilian character, in the public interest and not of a punitive nature;
5. Emphasizes that States should take the necessary measures to refrain from subjecting conscientious objectors to imprisonment and to repeated punishment for failure to perform military service, and recalls that no one shall be liable or punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of each country;
6. Reiterates that States, in their law and practice, must not discriminate against conscientious objectors in relation to their terms or conditions of service, or any economic, social, cultural, civil or political rights;
7. Encourages States, subject to the circumstances of the individual case meeting the other requirements of the definition of a refugee as set out in the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, to consider granting asylum to those conscientious objectors compelled to leave their country of origin because they fear persecution owing to their refusal to perform military service when there is no provision, or no adequate provision, for conscientious objection to military service;
8. Affirms the importance of the availability of information about the right to conscientious objection to military service, and the means of acquiring conscientious objector status, to all persons affected by military service;
9. Requests the Secretary-General to transmit the text of the present resolutions to Governments, the specialized agencies and relevant intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations and to include the right to conscientious objection to military service in the public information activities of the United Nations, including the United Nations Decade for Human Rights Education;
10. Also requests the Secretary-General to collect information from Governments, the specialized agencies and intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations on recent developments in this field and to submit a report, within existing resources, to the Commission at its fiftysixth session;
11. Decides to consider this matter further at its fifty-sixth session under the agenda item entitled "The question of conscientious objection to military service".
58th meeting
22 April 1998
[Adopted without a vote. See chap. XXII.]
IF A WOMAN CAN DO THIS WHY CAN'T YOU:
Katherine Jashinski (born 1982) was the first female to refuse duty as part of the War on Terror. Katherine was born in Milwaukee, WI and enlisted in the Army National Guard as a cook (MOS 92G) in April 2002 signing a six year service contract. [1] She cited a desire to experience military life as a primary reason for enlisting in the Army. In June 2004, she applied for discharge as a conscientious objector. The Army denied her claim a year and a half later. In late 2005 she was ordered to weapons training in preparation for deployment to Afghanistan at which time she refused and was brought up on charges. In court on May 23 2006, Katherine was acquitted of the more serious charge of missing movement by design, but pleaded guilty to refusal to obey a legal order. She received a bad conduct discharge and was sentenced to 120 days confinement, with credit for 53 days already served (at Fort Benning), and 20 days off for good behavior. Katherine was released from custody on July 9th 2006. She is currently attending the University of Texas at Austin.
http://www.myspace.com/freekatherine
EVEN SOME JEWS CAN DO THIS .. SO WHY CAN'T YOU ?
http://www.wri-irg.org/co/co-isr-03.htm
DOWNLOAD:
http://www.militaryfreeschools.org/PDF/ConsObjLP/basic.pdf
http://www.militaryfreeschools.org/PDF/Con.../ConscObjLP.pdf
USEFUL LINKS:
http://www.teachpeace.com/movies2all.htm
http://www.resistersbook.org/
http://www.freewebs.com/the_intermind/index.htm
http://www.peace-out.com/
http://ivaw.org/
http://www.nodraftnoway.org/
http://www.wri-irg.org/co-home.htm
http://www.centeronconscience.org/military_co/
http://www.iwillnotkill.org/