Huh.........
Awwal to topic ye hai hi nahin ke yazeed ka shumaar khulafa e raashideen ya raviyaan e hadith mein hota hai...........jo iss topic se aisa samjha hai ye uski apni soch ka qasoor hai.........
Topic hai Zain ul aabideen ka bait e Yazeed..........Na ke Yazeed as Khalifa e Rashid. ok
Hazrat Muhammad bin Hanfia ke baaray mein aapka kehna hai ke wo na to Sahabi hain aur na hi tabayee :d To phir wo kya hain?? Doosri baat ke agar sahabi bhi hotay to aap ne konsa sahabiyun ko bakhsha hai aap to unhein bhi sar e aam gaaliyaan detay ho

Hazrat Ibne Hanfia yani Brother of Hussain(RA) ka bouhat buland martaba tha......Jab unko yazeed ke khilaaf baghawat kerne ka kaha gaya to unhon ne kaha kyun karon mein baghawat?? jawab mein logon ne kaha ke wo sharab peeta hai , zana kerta hai aur namaz chhorta hai.............Iss par Ibne Hanifa ka bayaan hai ke "Kya tumne ussay aisa kertay dekha".......Logon ne kaha nahin humne aisa suna hai, iss par ibne Hanifa ka bayaan hai ke "Mein khud kayi baar kayi kayi din yazeed ke paas araha hon laikin meine aaj tak uss mein aisi koi burayi nahin dekhi".
Ab Aap aam logon ka wo bayaan jo suna sunaya hai qabool kertay hain aur Hazrat Ibne Haneefa ka bayaan jo eye-witness ki haisiyyat rakhta hai usko baghair kisi wajah ke radd kertay hain ........:d :d well done.
Baki marvan(RA) aik sahabi thay, Hazoor(PBUH) ki wafaat ke wakt unki umar 11 saal thi, Hussainikhandaan ne Marvan ke khandaan mein apni bouhat si larkiyun ko nikah mein diya.........Marvaan(RA) ke mutallik wazayee rawayat koi maani nahin rakhti jo k abu mukhnaf and co ki bayaan kerda hain........Aik hadith aapne yahan ye keh ker bayaan ki hai ke hazoor(PBUH) ne kaha ke ye maindak jaisa hai aur iska baap bhi maindak ya girgat jaisa tha............Ye alfaaz khud iss rawayat ke jhoota honay ka saboot hain ke mere Rasool(PBUH) ki lnaguage aajkal ke shias jaisi nahin thi.......Hazoor(PBUH) se aisay alfaaz mansoob kertay huway banday ko zara sharam ker leni chaahiye k iss se kisi aur ki reputation kharab ho na ho hamaray Nabi(PBUH) ki izzat par zaroor harf aata hai.....unkay sahabi honay ke mutallik ooper pages mein hi ref majood hai.
Muslim bin Aqba(RA) ko aap sahabi na bhi maano to kya farq, aap to sahabiyun ko gaaliyaan dene se baaz nahin aatay, to ye kya baat hui ke wo sahabi thay ya nahin....aapne jab gaali deni hai to konsa dekhna hi hai ke ye sahabi bhi hai ya nahin.
Sirf aakhri aik do pages related hain topic se, jin mein Zain ul Aabideen ke mutallik bayaan hai......lekin yahan bhi kamaal ki hoshiyaari dikhayi hai bajaye iskay ke unki bait par baat kertay phir yazeed ki buraiyaan bhi wahan shuru ker di, Jabke baat ye nahin thi ke yazeed bura tha ya nahin baat ye thi ke zain ul aabideen ne karbala ke sab wakayaat apni aankhon se dekhne ke baad bhi uski bait ker li aur uskay khilaaf kisi baghawat ka hissa na banay ye sab kya saabit kerta hai??
Aapne lisaan ul meezan ke hawalay se kaha ke Umr bin Abdul Azeez ne aik shakhs ko 20 koray lagaye ke usne yazeed ko koray lagaye.........Lekin aap itnay bay-eeman niklay ke uss ke aagay jo rawayaat bayaan hui hain wo chhor gaye.....ye rawayat bayaan kerne ke baad mazeed rawayaat bayaan ki gayi hain jin mein iss baat ki tardeed majood hai aur aakhir mein kaha gaya hai ke "inn sahi rawayaat se unn kaazib rawayaat ki takzeeb ho jaati hai jin mein umr bin abdul azeez ke kisi shakhs ko 20 koray maarne ka kaha gaya hai."
Wesay agar ameer ul momineen kehne par koray parnay chaahiye to abhi aapnay khud aitraaf kya ke "imam" zain ul aabideen ne yazeed ko ameer ul momineen kaha ,to phir to unko bhi koray parnay chahaiye.......hana??
Phir mazay ki baat ke yazeed ke itna faasiq aur kaafir honay ke bawajood aur usko gaaliyan dene ke bawajood bhi aapkay paas koi valid reasoning nahin ke zain ul aabideen ne uskay khilaaf jang mein doosron ki madad kyun na ki.....balkeh khalifa ko likh bhaija ke mujhe loag jang ke liye uqsa rahay hain :d aur iski reasoning mulahiza ho ke wo jang o jadal se door rehtay thay........to bhai phir wo karbala mein kya kerne gaye thay??
Aap bechaaron ko jab kaha jaaye ke Hussain(RA) ne Muaviyah(RA) ki bait ker li to kehtay hain wo sula joo aur jang se door rehne waalay thay aur ye hikmat thi, jab hussain(RA) ki baari aati hai to saari hikmat hawa ho jaati hai tab yazeed ke khilaaf uthna islam ke liye uthna tha, laikin ussi yazeed ke khilaaf na uthne par zain ul aabideen ke mutallik kehtay hain ke wo jang se door rehtay thay aur ye unki hikmat thi :d :d :d
Nahin bacha paain gay aap loag apnay imams ko jab tak aap issi mazhab par rahain gay aur jab aap ye shiite chhor dein gay to sab sahi ho jaaye ga ye jhootay bahanay bana bana ker defend nahin kerna paray ga.......
Yazeed ko dua di to uski explanation mulahiza ho ke ta ke loag keh na sakain ke ye ehsan faramosh thay :d :d nice one.
QUOTE
ab bhi yazeed sahee hai tu sahee kahanay walay per bhi lanat or uss ki all per bhi..bye
Soch lo ke iss lanat mein aapkay imam bhi shamail hain

jinhon ne na sirf yazeed ki bait ki, usko dua di balkeh uskay khilaaf kisi bhi baghawat mein hissa lene se inkaar ker diya.......Aur unki aal par laanat bhaij ker aap ne apnay sab imams par tabarra kya hai........Yahi nahin Ibne Haneefa yani HAzrat Hussain(RA) ke bhai ne yazeed ko sharabi o zani kehne waalon ko jhoota kaha to unn apr bhi aapki ye laanat badarja e oola pari aur unki aal kon thi ye bhi aapki maloom hona chahaiye...........
Hazrat Ali(RA) ne Muaviyah(RA) se jang ki, Hasan(RA) ne uss se sulah aur bait ki.
Hazrat Hussain(RA) ne Yazeed se jang ki, Zain ul Aabideen(RA) ne uss se sulah aur bait ki.
:d :d Yaa to apnay imams ko kuch samjhao ya khud kuch samajh jaao.ye bahanay na karo ke imam ko jang ka shauq nahin tha, bhala jis shakhs ko jehad ka shauq nahin wo imam kehlanay ke laiq ho sakta hai??